In redundancy and Infeasibility there a constraint that don't intersect with the other constraint, if ever that we remove that constraint what we call that cases, a redundancy or infeasibility?
Welcome!
This community is for professionals and enthusiasts of our products and services.
Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.
This question has been flagged
I think if removing a constraint leads to a feasible problem, it's redundancy. If it makes the problem infeasible, it's infeasibility
thanks I rate your answer 1 to 10, -1/10
To answer that question, when you are pertaining if there's a constraint that doesn't intersect with the other constraint you will remove the unnecessary constraint that is redundancy. I hope my answer helps you. Thank you for this question Mr. Bolibol
another -1 for this question haha
Just answer I will automatically give you a like
True
it would be a redundancy.
to short haha
lol
Rebundancy
Like is added :)
If removing a constraint that doesn't intersect with others results in a feasible solution space, it's referred to as redundancy; if it leads to an impossible solution space, it's considered infeasibility.
Redundancy.
If you have a constraint that doesn't intersect or overlap with any other constraints in the feasible region, and you remove that constraint, it would typically be referred to as a redundant constraint rather than an infeasibility.
Its Redundancy.
addedddd like
Redundancy
If a constraint is removed from a problem that has both redundancy and infeasibility, the resulting case would be called infeasibility. A redundant constraint is a constraint in linear programming that does not have any effect on the feasible region of the solution. On the other hand, infeasibility occurs when a problem has no feasible solution, meaning that no solution satisfies all the constraints. Therefore, if a constraint is removed from a problem that has both redundancy and infeasibility, the resulting problem would still be infeasible.
thanks for answering 1 like for you